2025-2035 Solid Waste Management Plan

Important Updates: State and Regional Solid Waste Plans

The Tennessee Department of Environment and Conservation (TDEC) is committed to developing a strong, actionable Statewide Solid Waste Management Plan (State Plan) that provides clear direction for Tennessee’s solid waste system and supports regional planning efforts. TDEC’s goal is for the State Plan to guide decisions regarding how communities across the state handle solid waste disposal, reduction, reuse, and recycling.

Based on recent legislative developments, TDEC will be extending the timeline to finalize the State Plan and regional solid waste management plans (Regional Plans).

Background

Tennessee’s solid waste planning framework is established in state law:

  • Tennessee Code Annotated (T.C.A.) 68-211-603 requires TDEC to develop a statewide solid waste management plan (State Plan)
  • T.C.A. 68-211-813 requires each solid waste planning region to develop its own regional solid waste management plan (Regional Plan)
  • T.C.A. 68-211-815 requires that each Regional Plan be: 
    • Consistent with the statewide solid waste management plan (State Plan)
    • Consistent with T.C.A. Title 68, Chapter 211, Part 8
    • Consistent with all applicable laws and regulations promulgated by TDEC

This structure establishes a coordinated planning process in which the State Plan provides direction, and Regional Plans are developed in alignment with that framework.

Map of the Tennessee Municipal Solid Waste Planning Regions
Map of Tennessee Municipal Solid Waste Planning Regions

Upcoming Workshops

WorkshopDatesTimeAddressRegistration Link
Murfreesboro November 4th-6th, 20269:00 am to 3:30 pm CSTFleming Training Center, 2022 Blanton Drive, Murfreesboro, TN 37129Registration Link
Johnson CityNovember 16, 20269:00 am to 3:30 pm ESTThe Carnegie Hotel, 1216 W State of Franklin Road, Johnson City, TN 37604Registration Link
KnoxvilleNovember 18, 202612:30 pm to 4:00 pm ESTKnoxville Field Office, 3711 Middlebrook Pike, Knoxville, TN 37921Registration Link
Paris Landing State ParkDecember 8th-9th, 20269:00 am to 3:30 pm CSTParis Landing State Park Hotel, 400 Lodge Road, Buchanan, TN 38222Registration Link

Murfreesboro Workshop 

        November 4th: Ten-Year Plan, Part 8 & 9 Workshop
        November 5th: Ten-Year Plan Do-It-Yourself Workshop
        November 6th: Ten-Year Plan Do-It-Yourself Workshop

For questions about upcoming workshops, please get in touch with William Anderson at William.Anderson.Jr@tn.gov. 

Development District Only Workshop

For questions about the upcoming Development District Workshop, please contact Robin Chance at Robin.Chance@tn.gov. 

WorkshopDatesTimeAddressRegistration Link
Development DistrictsNovember 3, 20269:00 am to 3:30 pm CSTFleming Training Center, 2022 Blanton Drive, Murfreesboro, TN 37129Register for Development Districts Workshop

Why the Timeline is Being Extended

A recent statutory change aligns the State Plan, TDEC regulations, and regional planning processes to ensure consistency across regions. More specifically, the change:

  • Clarifies that TDEC is responsible for approving or disapproving Regional Plans based on compliance with statute;
  • Directs that TDEC promulgate rules establishing criteria for review of Regional Plans, with rulemaking required by December 31, 2027;
  • Requires solid waste planning regions to submit their plans to TDEC for review by July 1, 2028; and

New Timeline

  • November 2026: TDEC publishes the State Plan
  • January 2027: Regional Planning Grants open
  • April 2027: Grant contracts with counties executed
  • June 2027: New rules published  Prior to this date, TDEC will engage the regions on the draft rules, including holding a public hearing and public comment period to receive feedback
  • July 1, 2028: Regions submit their Regional Plans to TDEC 

TDEC’s goal is to ensure regions have adequate time to develop and submit their Regional Plans to TDEC.

  • This timeline is subject to change as work on the State Plan, rulemaking, and regional planning process continues.
  • If it becomes apparent that one or more timeline milestones cannot be met, TDEC may adjust the schedule to better support successful regional planning efforts.
  • TDEC will communicate any timeline changes in advance.

What This Means

Extending the timeline will allow TDEC to:

  • Ensure alignment between the State Plan, statute and rulemaking, and implementation tools;
  • Provide better guidance to regions as they develop their required Regional Plans;
  • Use stakeholder feedback received so far to update the State Plan such that it is practical, durable, and clearly defines TDEC’s role in implementation;
  • Give regions more time to understand what is required in their Regional Plans and extend the timeline for submitting them to TDEC; and
  • Revise the schedule for Regional Plan development grants to align with updated requirements and planning timelines.

What Is Not Changing

  • Work completed to date will continue to inform the final State Plan
  • TDEC remains committed to stakeholder engagement throughout the process

Next Steps

TDEC will:

  • Continue refining the State Plan to strengthen its implementation framework
  • Coordinate State Plan development with ongoing rulemaking efforts
  • Initiate a series of meetings with counties and regional stakeholders to
    • Provide updates,
    • Discuss the revised timeline, and
    • Explain the new law and associated regulatory requirements and expectations, including how they will affect the development of Regional Plans
       

Accomplishments and Lessons Learned 2015-25 State Ten-Year Master Plan

An Approach to Improvement

Continuous improvement requires agencies to assess whether projects meet their objectives systematically. The American Society for Quality’s Plan-Do-Check-Act (PDCA) cycle—a four-step iterative method—drives ongoing enhancement in processes, products, and services. Successful strategies are standardized and implemented more broadly, while unsuccessful approaches are revised using lessons learned. This methodology applies to both entire plans and individual elements, strengthening future planning.

This document serves as the “Check” phase: the initial plan was the “Plan,” implementation activities were the “Do,” and the final “Act” step will apply lessons learned from the 2015-2025 Statewide Solid Waste and Materials Management Plan (2025 Plan) to the 2025-2035 Statewide Solid Waste Management Plan (2035 Plan) currently in development. The evaluation summarizes improvements and reviews accomplishments at mid-term and end-term for each plan objective, providing an overview of key activities that support the planning goals. Subsequent sections objectively assess implementation quality and effectiveness and identify broad opportunities to enhance performance and impact.

Mid-Term Objective Review and Accomplishments

2015-2020 Review

It has been over 30 years since the SWMA (Solid Waste Management Act) set a 25% waste reduction and diversion goal. This goal arose from concerns about adequacy, the need for environmentally sound landfills, and the need to ensure the State’s future disposal needs are met. The State Legislature authorized the Solid Waste Advisory Committee (SWAC) to study solid waste and make recommendations to TDEC for a new approach to solid waste and materials management. The 2025 Plan preparers incorporated these recommendations into Objective 1 of the 2025 Plan.

In October 2015, TDEC initiated a push to establish a new solid waste goal. The Office of Policy and Planning (OPP) and the Division of Solid Waste Management (DSWM) created a work group to refine recommendations further and prepare suitable language for stakeholders to establish a new goal. Solid waste professionals from counties across the State of Tennessee comprised the work group. This effort ultimately ended because the collected data did not meet a trustworthy standard and lacked data integrity due to inconsistencies.

At that time, TDEC sought to improve data collection and management, as well as associated review procedures, and to initiate the development of formal guidance on data management for the Regions. As TDEC can confirm, local government data is accurate; sound measurement and metrics can ensure the reasonableness of goals that keep momentum without jeopardizing local government budgets or staffing.

In 2018, DSWM (now the Division of Land Protection – Waste Management Branch, or DLP) and the Office of Planning and Sustainable Practices (OPSP) worked to ensure that recycling was included in all State contract procurements. This effort was not entirely successful, but it did get the Department of General Services (DGS) to include recycling contract best practices in its template guidance. While DGS does not require recycled-based procurement, they strongly encourage it. DGS embedded the best practices document into the procurement contract guide handbook to aid the State’s offices in sustainable procurement.

TDEC prepared language for the qualitative portion of a new goal after consulting affected stakeholders in calendar year 2022. TDEC delayed quantitative goal language until data collection improves across the Regions, the ability to crosswalk legacy data into new data structure formats is in place, staff is trained in improved data review, and stakeholder consensus is achieved on what constitutes reasonable progress in establishing a new goal. Some additional recommendations include revising the primary key policy, using industry codes (SIC and NAICS), and improving overall year-over-year consistency.

The Regions submit their Annual Progress Reports (APRs) electronically. Work group recommendations include incorporating data into the electronic reporting system to better align with statutory requirements, but they still need refinement to provide continuity with historic data. TDEC will use data-based management technologies to access online reporting programs. The effort will prioritize data continuity between legacy and future data acquisition in 2022 by clearly defining data fields and creating a data plan. The data plan will project future data needs and incorporate them into the data structure to minimize future impact.

2015-2020 Accomplishments

  • Yearly Annual Progress Report stakeholder meetings.
  • Annual review of 95 counties’ Annual Progress Reports.
  • Updated Annual Progress Reporting tool.
  • Top Five County Stakeholder meetings.
  • New waste reduction or recycling goal review.
  • Data management, data gaps, and data collection review for data integrity.
  • Initiated a data management team to construct better data tools to improve data integrity.
  • Prepared and launched a new “Local Solid Waste Management Reporting and Planning Guide”.
  • Convened a solid waste director stakeholder working group for APR data collection improvement.
  • Supported Metropolitan Nashville-Davidson County’s waste characterization study. The study serves as a template for future characterization studies to build apples-to-apples comparisons.
  • Conducted several surveys to gauge stakeholder receptiveness to different goal styles or types.
  • Initiated the collection of material origin reporting from Class III landfills and Recovered Materials Processing Facilities (RMPF).
  • Reviewed demonstration project for waste “autoclaving” and anaerobic digestion.
  • Prepared a county-by-county 4-tier qualitative solid waste management system review.
  • Prepared a list of State-level agency recycling improvements.
  • Worked with DGS to include recycling best practices for agencies to use in future contract procurements. DGS has included this practice guidance in its RFP/Contracting template.

2015-2020 Review

Studies have found that most people will recycle when collection options are available. The core of Objective 2 seeks to make recycling convenient and available, thereby increasing participation. These efforts increase economies of scale, making recycling less costly and maximizing revenue through greater efficiency and volume. Availability and accessibility are only possible if drop-off locations offer both recycling and disposal options, a practice known as “pairing.” This strategy has been a core component of many technical and financial programs in the first half of the plan's implementation. To lead by example, TDEC surveyed the containers at Tennessee State Parks. Most of those containers were isolated garbage cans for disposal, without recycling. The purchase and rollout of Bear-Saver containers, which enabled recycling and disposal, not only improved access to recycling and disposal but also reduced the need to clean up trash from animal incursions, according to park staff. This added benefit reduces maintenance time, keeps the parks looking clean, and provides a branded look in support of the Tennessee State Parks’ “Go Green with Us” program.

During the initial implementation period of the 2025 Plan, eight counties still relied on 104 unmanned county collection containers, or “green boxes,” to manage waste. TDEC offered convenience center grants, prioritizing these counties, to provide higher levels of service to the communities. Unfortunately, the convenience center grants did not provide sufficient incentive or regulatory push for the counties to replace all the “green boxes” with manned sites. Additional resources, in the form of education and outreach efforts, will be coupled with convenience center grants in the future to help reduce or replace these counties’ reliance on green boxes with better waste collection methods.

Other Objective 2 efforts during the first half of implementation focused on a “Hub and Spoke” approach to recycling collection and processing. The hub-and-spoke approach increased operational economies of scale and reduced the cost per ton collected and managed. The two flagship programs continued to grow even during the COVID-19 pandemic. The West Tennessee Recycling Hub is located outside the city of Henderson in Chester County, and the Marshall County Recycling Hub is in Lewisburg, both of which provide services to support neighboring counties and municipalities. Hub-and-spoke efforts further allow specialization in collection for the spoke governments and in processing for the hub county. This specialization helps keep local costs down. This program supports several plan objectives in a significant manner. Strategies under this objective identify resources and partnerships to help local governments expand access to curbside collection. TDEC focused on partnering with national organizations such as the Recycling Partnership and Southeast Recycling Development Council (SERDC), leveraging their networks to provide additional resources to assist the top five most populous counties. These organizations provided technical assistance and matching grants to expand recycling among their residents significantly. The Urban Green Lab (UGL) grant for education and outreach promoted the transfer of industry expertise in commercial and industrial recycling. Support for the state’s hub-and-spoke program in rural areas and assistance to the top five most populous counties during the next half of implementation will continue. Both programs offer the greatest return in terms of recycling capacity and access to higher-level recycling systems. Also, the continued efforts to pair recycling and disposal collection and to build upon the Industry/Commercial/Institutional (ICI) recycling network will continue.

2015-2020 Accomplishments

  • Defined state’s hub-and-spoke program, provided technical assistance and training to hub directors on facility design, data management, outreach and education, safety, and contracting with other local governments.
  • Established grant plan, implemented consistent application across grant programs, established consistent grant cycles, and conducted workshops at solicitation and project management conferences to launch awarded projects.
  • Launched grant application in the new Grants Management System.
  • Partnered with Giles County to eliminate significant convenience center deficiencies and opened two new convenience centers that provided recycling access as a spoke and supported the Marshall County Hub.
  • Hosted two Top 5 County Initiative Summits designed to aid the networking of larger counties and better address challenges such as education and outreach to citizens unique to large urban populations.
  • Distributed to hub-and-spoke programs durable signage that improved recycling collection communication and reduced contamination.
  • Launched education and outreach with assistance from the SERDC #RecycleRight campaign designed to reduce contamination.
  • Explored the possibility of using cell phone applications to communicate recycling options better. Several top 5 counties moved forward with the project.
  • Bear-Saver containers and indoor containers that provided paired access to recycling and disposal options were put in place at State Parks under a Memorandum of Understanding.
  • Proactively added an RFID requirement for carts purchased under grants.
  • Successfully updated the statute that disincentivized waste reduction under the Recycling Rebate. Balanced the formula to be more equitable and useful.
  • Built a partnership with the Recycling Partnership and their network to increase the effectiveness of the curbside recycling grant and to provide hub operators strategies to communicate with their constituents effectively.
  • Partnered with the UGL to work with industries in the Nashville Area to provide monthly sustainability meetings that shared successes and built networking opportunities.
  • Worked with WestRock, City of Knoxville, and Knox County to discuss processing barriers in the county that might aid in increased capacity.
  • DSWM and OPSP aligned the “Green Star Partnership” with the Materials Marketplace (MMP).
  • Worked with DGS to include recycling best practices for agencies to use in future contract procurements. DGS has included this practice guidance in its RFP/Contracting template.
  • Worked with DSWM Permitting Section to improve the Permit by Rule/Recycler Registration for problem wastes such as electronics and tires as RMPF(s).
  • Initiated the Tennessee Training Academy partnership to improve professional integrated solid waste management systems.
  • Provided 40 Hour HAZWOPER (Hazardous Waste Operations and Emergency Response) training to Household Hazardous Waste Collection Facility (HHWCF) operators.
  • Reviewed HHWCF operations and funding to address shortcomings.
  • Initiated the sustainably designed Tennessee School Laboratory Rehabilitation Program (TSLRP), the successor to the School Chemical Cleanout Campaign, a dormant federal program.
  • Initiated the Household Hazardous Waste Temporary Structure (HHWTS) infrastructure program, providing year-round household hazardous waste (HHW) collection options.

2015-2020 Review

As described in Objective 2, increasing the size and efficiency of Tennessee’s recycling hub-and-spoke program remains a priority and an active strategy for TDEC. Early in the 2025 Plan implementation, the Department developed a general guide and best-practices tool to serve as a handbook for identified hub counties and their respective spokes. TDEC awarded grants that increased recycling processing throughput capacity. Also, TDEC provided these hubs with technical support, including hub-processing training, budget management, contract negotiations, problem-solving, and financial assistance for purchasing and distributing recycling carts. The goal of this technical assistance was to improve business operations and general efficiency. TDEC also worked with private-sector material recovery facilities, such as WestRock in Chattanooga and Knoxville, to expand their commercial hub operations in higher-density urban areas and fill the gap in far eastern Tennessee at the closure of a regional material recovery facility.

Strategies within this objective direct TDEC to build partnerships and support organizations that collect and process recyclable materials. To this end, TDEC, early in the 2025 Plan implementation, partnered with the University of Tennessee’s County Technical Assistance Service (CTAS), the Tennessee chapter of the Solid Waste Association of North America (SWANA), the Tennessee Solid Waste Director’s Association (TSWDA), the Tennessee Recycling Coalition (TRC), and the SERDC to form the Tennessee Training Academy (TTA). This effort provided 53 scholarships and industry-specific training to more than 80 solid waste professionals over a three-year period. The training improved the quality of solid waste professionals statewide. The TTA provided training opportunities that most county solid waste professionals could not otherwise access because of out-of-pocket costs. These professionals applied the knowledge they gained and passed on the benefits to their colleagues and staff.

Another important accomplishment during the initial implementation is the establishment of the new Tennessee Materials Marketplace, or MMP. The initiative aims to build a self-sustaining marketplace in which one entity’s waste products serve as another’s source materials.  As of 2021, the MMP had 257 registered users and logged 83 unique transactions since 2017, with a total of 5,000 tons of materials valued at over $500,000 exchanged. Further supporting this effort, TDEC and its contractors held eight unique presentations, workshops, and site visits. The project's success shows that users in over 569 locations worldwide are searching for materials, underscoring the axiom that markets know no borders. The most popular materials include pails and totes for food, varnish, phosphorus acid, wood waste as a soil additive, and white super sacks. The second half of the 2025 Plan's implementation continues to use hub-and-spoke approaches and promotes the virtual materials marketplace. The early successes are expected to continue into the second half of the 2025 Plan implementation.

2015-2020 Accomplishments

  • Contracted with the USBCSD (United States Business Council for Sustainable Development) to develop, deploy, and make sustainable Tennessee MMP.
  • Established a formal hub-and-spoke program that built greater economies of scale and fulfilled the role of the former NGO known as the Recycling Market Cooperative of Tennessee (RMCT) and the responsibilities of the Office of Cooperative Marketing.
  • Provided annual training to hub operators and biannual training to spoke participating communities to improve performance, increase efficiency, and provide strategies for growth.
  • Met with WestRock in Chattanooga and Knoxville to explore increasing capacity in their market to promote the increase of residential curbside recycling in those cities.
  • MMP increased users to 252 on its materials marketplace site. Transacted 83 unique transactions of 5,000 tons since 2017 valued at over $510,000. Visits to the site from all over the world.
  • Contracted with the University of Tennessee at Knoxville to look at applications for waste glass.
  • The DWR approved the use of TDA (tire chips) as a suitable medium for Subsurface Sewerage Disposal Systems (SSD).
  • TDEC worked with TDOT to understand the benefits of using tire-derived materials in projects. TDOT has allowed Ground Tire Rubber in TDOT specifications.
  • Surveyed states nationally to determine their usage of tires for alternate daily cover.

2015-2020 Review

A significant amount of organic material comes from overproduction of food waste, leading to discards. Over-production can take the form of out-of-date food packages or unserved food at banqueting facilities. These materials sent to landfills potentially increase environmental impacts, community concerns, and perceptions, and consume valuable landfill airspace.

The first half of the 2025 plan implementation period saw grants targeting this waste, providing financial and technical assistance to organizations such as the Second Harvest Food Bank of Middle Tennessee, Green Turnip of Nashville, and university food pantries. These organic management grants further benefited established and prospective composters in the state.

TDEC initiated an awareness program at the Nashville Farmer’s Market with a screening of the documentary “Just Eat It: A Food Waste Story.” This event led to a major roundtable discussion that examined the broader picture of food waste in Tennessee.

TDEC adopted a new composting rule based on the US Composting Council’s model. The rule relaxed barrier regulations that experts deemed unnecessary and improved oversight quality, resulting in increased composting. This effort also included training developed by TDEC for composting operation operators.

The Tennessee State Parks (TSP) hospitality system also benefited from the technical and financial assistance generated by this objective. Several parks started composting so TDEC could lead by example and benefited from organic management grants when the state’s organic stakeholders solicited them.

As organics make up a significant fraction of the total waste generated, TDEC will continue to revisit Objective 4 in the second half of implementation, building upon the organic management technical resources cultivated in the first half.

2015-2020 Accomplishments

  • Hosted a roundtable discussion to engage local agencies, private businesses, industries, educational institutions, and non-profits on food waste reduction.
  • Updated and expanded composting grant requirements to a broader organics management grant.
  • Hosted a public food waste reduction event in Nashville at the Farmer’s Market, featuring the documentary “Just Eat It: A Food Waste Story” along with many exhibitors that promoted food waste diversion.
  • TDEC launched a new website for organics management.
  • Conducted composting workshops for local governments and Tennessee State Park staff.
  • Promulgated improved composting regulations.
  • Initiated the Get Food Smart Program and website.
  • Improved food donation liability protections.
  • Expanded the number of composting operations in Tennessee.
  • Initiated, expanded, or supported food pantries at multiple institutions of higher learning.
  • Provided technical and financial assistance to local governments, state agencies, and private composters; responded to general composting or organics management questions.

2015-2020 Review

This objective achieved some success in the first half of the implementation period. As noted in the Objective 4 update, organics management saw significant growth in new approaches and technologies. This growth came from projects that expanded the long-held position to create more access. This occurred through regulatory relaxation and the exploration of new approaches (such as aiding the food-insecure by encouraging food establishments to distribute their perfectly safe, unused, or unserved food beneficially), including anaerobic fermentation, gasification, and biodiesel production.

In 2019, the General Assembly passed Public Chapter 181, which specifies that gasification facilities and pyrolysis facilities are not solid waste facilities or incinerators. Further, the post-use polymers and recoverable feedstocks are also not solid waste. However, gasification and pyrolysis facilities remain subject to other applicable environmental, health, and safety requirements, thereby supporting this objective. In East Tennessee, TDEC has provided technical assistance to promising chemical recycling operations. These types of facilities are important to the State’s integrated solid waste management system, helping to address changes in the global commodity market and providing local market options for collectors of plastic recyclables.

TDEC increased year-round access to HHW collection in rural counties pre-pandemic through a pilot program that developed, funded, and distributed six temporary HHW collection and storage buildings. The State HHW contractor provides these operations with milk runs at a reduced cost, while improving collection opportunities for citizens.

The second-half implementation will continue to see TDEC working with organizations such as the Tennessee Chamber of Commerce and Industry, the Department of Economic and Community Development, and local governments as new technologies emerge and require evaluation. Tire solutions remain on the table to explore new ways to address that potentially problematic waste.

2015-2020 Accomplishments

  • Worked with hub operators to identify and procure new technologies that improve hub efficiency, including optical sortation and robotic equipment.
  • Prepared hub-and-spoke program handbook resource for hub operators.
  • Provided resources to hub operators on best practices for the use of contracts, memoranda of understanding, and service agreements.
  • Reviewed a demonstration project for “autoclaving” technology in Sequatchie County.
  • The 111th General Assembly passed Public Chapter 181, which specifies that gasification facilities and pyrolysis facilities are not solid waste facilities or incinerators, and that post-use polymers are not solid waste but recoverable feedstocks. This supports the establishment of chemical recycling efforts.
  • Initiated and rolled out a pilot program of HHWTS buildings in Chester, Giles, Loudon, McMinn, Blount, and Grainger counties that allow for year-round collection of household hazardous wastes.
  • Partnered with SERDC for recycling market development, system review to reduce contamination, and general technical assistance.

2015-2020 Review

The State needs to aid local governments in developing an Education and Outreach plan. The State and the Regions must reach the public and inspire behavior change regarding what to recycle, how to recycle, and why recycling is important. Objective 6 is the plan’s mechanism to achieve this goal. During the initial half of implementation, TDEC provided many significant services, including developing key partnerships, providing financial and technical assistance, and improving the technical knowledge of local government solid waste professionals.

TDEC initiated key partnerships with the UGL. Initially, this took the form of a demonstration at an Objective 4 event. However, TDEC recognized UGL’s unique position and partnered with it to develop and deliver environmental training for teachers on topics such as composting, recycling, and waste reduction. UGL prepared a curriculum aligned with the Department of Education’s requirements and then taught teachers how to deliver it.

UGL did not stop there. Under another TDEC grant, UGL brought industry leaders together for networking events. These events allowed leaders to share the challenges they face and to showcase their accomplishments. The networking events allowed companies like Kroger to share their experiences with peer companies in the area.

Another key partnership that grew in the first half of implementation was the Tennessee Training Academy (TTA). This partnership, forged through a Memorandum of Understanding between TDEC and key agencies, including the Tennessee Chapter of SWANA, TSWDA, TRC, SERDC, and CTAS, provided industry- and sector-specific training. This training provided an opportunity for solid waste professionals to prepare for certifications that enhance subject-matter knowledge and program performance.

TDEC also improved communication with those interested in the State’s HHW Mobile Events. Direct notification to citizens who expressed interest increased utilization of the collection program. Another example of improved communication included the development of standard recycling messaging. SERDC developed a #RecycleRight campaign and provided local governments and the State with webspace and standard graphics. This important approach to recycling helps people move across the state and see standardized messaging.

The second half of the implementation will continue to require education and outreach initiatives. The #RecycleRight Campaign will continue and further integrate into the messaging of the Southeastern US EPA Region 4. Much of the messaging will focus on eliminating contamination, a global problem that affects local governments' revenue.

2015-2020 Accomplishments

  • Partnered and participated in an environmental literacy work group to support K-12 curriculum development that increases the environmental knowledge of young people in Tennessee.
  • Partnered with multiple civic organizations and Nashville Davidson County in an education and outreach event at the Farmer’s Market promoting food waste reduction.
  • Partnered and shared multiple location viewings of the food documentary “Just Eat It”.
  • Launched the TTA to provide increased training opportunities for solid waste and recycling professionals in materials management concepts.
  • Hosted multiple SWANA certification curriculum-based training courses on Recycling Systems, Integrated Solid Waste Management Systems, Composting, HHW/CESQG, and Transfer Stations.
  • DSWM hosted SUIT, LOCT, HZWIT, and Geology Roundtable discussions.
  • Initiated HHW collection awareness campaign using electronic mail and newsletter delivery that increased participation and lowered cost per pound expenses at mobile collection events.
  • Prepared multiple handout cards that promoted HHW green chemistry alternatives, used oil management, composting, and many other sustainable practices.
  • Launched a website that addresses new organics management, public and commercial composting, mulch, food waste reduction alternatives, and Get Food Smart, and provides many additional resources to the public.
  • Partnered with the UGL to produce a sustainability curriculum for K-12 that meets the Department of Education’s scholastic pedagogy requirements and to train teachers in its use.
  • Partnered with UGL to host networking sustainability meetings to showcase industry and commercial companies' recycling and sustainability efforts.
  • Offered technical and financial assistance to stakeholders on topics of materials management.
  • Partnered with the SERDC, leveraging an existing grant to develop, train, and implement the #RecycleRight campaign across Tennessee.
  • Instituted and awarded grant project management workshops designed to launch and complete awarded grant project scopes successfully.
  • Continued to promote, host, and provide qualified HAZWOPER classes for professionals and TDEC staff applicable to solid waste operations.
  • Partnered with Metropolitan Nashville-Davidson County Government, the Greater Nashville Regional Council, and other northern Middle Tennessee Counties to promote a cooperative materials management approach to their solid waste systems.
  • Hosted the internationally attended Measurement Matters Summit in Chattanooga, in partnership with the US EPA, US EPA Region 4 state program managers, the SERDC, and local governments, to promote and work toward improved measurement of solid waste and commodity materials.
  • Assisted the Air and Waste Management Association of West Tennessee in launching its first annual web conference in partnership with SERDC.
  • Provided technical and financial assistance to stakeholders.

2015-2020 Review

This objective uses three strategies to protect Tennessee from potentially harmful environmental impacts associated with solid waste disposal. The State’s focus on monitoring municipal solid waste disposal at landfills, unpermitted disposal sites (tire and trash dumps), and unmanned county collection systems remains a means of determining compliance with collection and disposal requirements.  The strategies used are detailed in the next few paragraphs.

The first half of the implementation period featured the promulgation of updated, improved composting rules. These rule changes will eliminate barriers that prohibit new composters from entering the marketplace. They further align TDEC’s regulatory efforts with true environmental concerns. In parallel, the management of generators' speculative accumulation of materials such as tires and computers is also under review.

DSWM (now DLP) annually receives information through the Annual Engineering Report that helps determine the remaining life of landfills. This information aids local governments in their solid waste planning. Further, the Division also collects solid waste and origin data for disposal and for recyclables. Again, this data is crucial for local governments’ ability to plan for future equipment purchases and facility expansions.

The last strategy dictates the need to address illegal disposal of waste and materials. DWSM (DLP) previously addressed unpermitted tire-disposal sites and used Solid Waste Management Fund (SWMF) funding to clean up several of them. This further applied to unpermitted disposal sites and to abandoned permitted landfills (orphaned landfill facilities). DSWM (DLP) manages such orphaned landfill facilities by directing monitoring, investigations, and assessments, and by implementing corrective actions to abate potential ongoing and future environmental impacts. Based on unfunded liabilities of approximately $2.4 million associated with old, abandoned landfills, DSWM (DLP) worked with the TDEC Commissioner’s office, Fiscal Services Division, Finance and Administration, as well as the Legislature to determine options that are available to assist in addressing this funding issue.

Items that will continue into the remaining 5 years of this plan include continued monitoring of solid waste facilities for remaining life, the origin of solid waste entering the facilities, material recovery facilities (MRFs), and the supplier source county or state. The Division will continue to collect information on unpermitted tire disposal and trash locations from the Regions in the Annual Progress Report.

2015-2020 Accomplishments

  • Increased direct HHW collection services to residents of Tennessee.
  • Increased available options to CESQG and initiated TSLRP.
  • Continued the monitoring of and response to unpermitted disposal sites.
  • Continued the monitoring of the Class I landfills remaining life and origin of waste.
  • Added the monitoring of Class III landfills and (RMPF(s)).
  • Provided technical and financial resources to expand and upgrade convenience centers.
  • Converted the majority of files from paper to digital copies for improved access, reduced storage, and reduced waste at the source.
  • Improved annual landfill reporting to include a more comprehensive annual engineering report, increasing the accuracy and usability of the data collected.
  • Updated and clarified policy and guidance documents.
  • Compared and reconciled landfill-reported tonnage and surcharge payments.
  • Updated the new permit rule exemption language for RMPF.
  • Reviewed the waste reduction rule, specifically the goal, for improvement possibilities.
  • Provided technical and financial assistance to publicly owned landfills designated as Old Closed Landfills.
  • Completed second tire removal project from the Nolichucky River.
  • Continued to offer technical and financial assistance to local governments and coordinate efforts with the Department of Transportation on unpermitted tire disposal sites.

2015-2020 Review

Stakeholders identified that ensuring the solvency of solid waste management and recycling efforts for state and local governments is paramount to successful plan implementation. Objective 8 is based on this foundational need. To be solvent, TDEC must identify sound and sustainable funding sources that do not jeopardize plan implementation. The current funding for SWMA projects comes from the disposal of solid waste in landfills, with a $ 0.90-per-ton surcharge. The Solid Waste Regulatory Program (SWRP) also receives $0.35 per ton disposed of to fund regulatory activities. Also, the Department of Revenue deposits a predisposal management fee of $0.25 for each new tire sold at retail into the SWMF. These revenue sources are unlikely to be sufficient to cover future implementation costs. As waste diversion from landfills improves, disposal-derived funding may not keep pace with need and may decline significantly due to new technologies, increased demand for secondary materials in the supply chain, and evolving waste composition. Likewise, if new technologies arise that make tires less preferred, tire funding amounts may fall accordingly.

To address these revenue concerns, the 2025 Plan identifies three strategies. These strategies include: 1) consider increased tipping fee surcharges on the disposal of solid waste, 2) raise revenue for waste reduction, recycling, and integrated solid waste management from new sources, and 3) support the development of sustainable funding strategies for local programs. The initial two strategies and accompanying tactics focus on reviewing and considering new ways to generate revenue to support program needs. The last strategy and its tactics direct TDEC to track program costs and revenues on a full-cost accounting basis, develop and present information to help local governments minimize costs and increase revenues, and work with local governments to identify potential cost savings by increasing waste reduction and diversion efforts.

A working group comprising OPP and the DSWM (DLP) initiated a review of Objective 8 topics to make recommendations. During the first half of 2025 Plan implementation, the working group considered proposing a new surcharge on construction and demolition (C&D) landfill disposal to fund future C&D diversion efforts. The goal of this surcharge would be to incentivize a shift away from landfilling C&D materials toward recycling them. Also, TDEC considered increasing the $1.25-per-ton landfill tipping fee surcharge to $2.00 per ton to better align with several surrounding state surcharges. The internal working group determined the Department did not need fee adjustments at the time. The group redirected its focus to explore mechanisms to ensure that the Department reallocates as much of the surcharge revenue as possible to communities, with the goal of improving their recycling, composting, and waste-reduction programs.

Objective 8 is key to implementing all objectives in the plan; it supports access to recycling, education and outreach, and environmentally sound disposal. These funds support improvements to the state's integrated solid waste systems, provide education and outreach to local governments, aid in cleaning up unpermitted tire disposal sites, and address critical environmental issues posed by orphaned landfills.

The DSWM (DLP) is working closely with TDEC Executive Leadership, Fiscal Services Division, Finance and Administration, and the Legislature to address approximately $2.4 million in unfunded liabilities associated with old, abandoned landfills across the state.

2015-2020 Accomplishments

  • Created a TDEC departmental working group between DSWM (DLP) and OPP to review the funding of solid waste and material management programs.
  • Continued to collect local government program costs and revenues to track funding trends.
  • Provided technical assistance to stakeholders regarding commodity markets influenced by China Green Fence, National Sword, and Blue-Sky enforcement policies.
  • Implemented transition to new grants management system by Smart Simple.
  • TDEC completed a LEAN project on grant processes, improving and streamlining the system.
  • Made presentations to program stakeholders on the topic of grants and increasing local government budget sustainability.

Disaster Debris Management

2015-2020 Review

Disaster Debris Management, or DDM, is new to regional municipal solid waste planning, but the need has long existed. TDEC initiated the first disaster debris topic at the annual solid waste conference, drawing strong interest from attendees, who spilled out into the hallway to listen. The Solid Waste Task Force of 2008-09 recommended adding DDM planning to the Solid Waste Management Act of 1991 and to solid waste rules, which the program accomplished during the 2025 Plan development.

At that time, DDM and DDM plans were new and undefined. The 2025 Plan incorporated DDM into the document's appendix to provide guidance for local government. The 2025 Plan, however, did not consider DDM a full plan objective. Plan development did not include applicable strategies and tactics, though their inclusion in statute and rule, and their importance, necessitate consideration.

2015-2020 Accomplishments

  • Partnered with the Tennessee Emergency Management Agency, the Department of Agriculture and several TDEC divisions in the creation of a model “fill-in-the-blank” DDM plan template. The template conformed to the FEMA PA325 program, which allows additional funding from a disaster event if the plan includes recycling of materials in its event management.
  • As of 2017, two-thirds of the counties (63 of 95) report submitting a DDM plan required under statute and rule. In 2020, only 15 reported having a Disaster Debris Management Plan; 12 indicated they did not; and 68 did not respond. Mid-Term Section Source: Department of Environment and Conservation, FY 2020-2021 Annual Report to the Governor and General Assembly on the SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT ACT OF 1991, Release Date April 6, 2022

End-Term Objective Review and Accomplishments

2020-2025 Review

Current efforts focus on data improvement and refinement. It is difficult to consider a new goal when current data quality cannot cleanly support it. The legacy data needed for use has been inaccessible due to system architecture, data integrity issues, or a lack of appropriate data tools. A quote by Peter Drucker underscores the central precept that what gets measured gets managed, a key objective. The cornerstone of management and progress measurement is clean, usable, and democratized data. Having historical legacy data aligned with current and future data will unlock positive outcomes for Objective 1's strategies. As the Department organizes and verifies the data, the process may improve its usability for a new division initiative known as Recycle Bin. This application module will be integrated into the Division’s Waste Bin data management system within the Department’s Oracle APEX enterprise system. Legacy data will backfill the Recycle Bin system and the future data viewer. The availability will lead policymakers to better, fact-based decision-making.

Staff is also working on fillable forms on the Department’s TDEC Forms site. This initiative will align legacy and future data to maintain continuity across years. The initial target for these initiatives was January 2024. These two tools improved the collection methodology, storage, and use of data.

2020-2025 Accomplishments

  • The Department provided several potential goal approaches to stakeholders, but there was no real movement towards goal adoption.
  • My TDEC Forms and Recycle Bin projects were initiated to improve the collection, storage, and usage of program data.
  • Eliminated historically contracted data collection and management services for more control and integration with the Department's enterprise systems.
  • Initiated multiple efforts to parse, clean, and harmonize data for improved usage.
  • Compiled research and prepared qualitative and quantitative goal approach considerations supporting the plan’s tactics.
  • Some effort has been made to develop data dictionaries for program data systems moving forward.

2020-2025 Review

In 2021, Tennessee State Parks implemented recycling upgrades at all 56 State Parks. These improvements to the recycling program are part of the broader Go Green with Us initiative, which promotes the integration of sustainable practices into park management and operations. The overall goal of the upgrades is to create a recycling program with a uniform appearance across all Tennessee State Parks to better inform visitors of their waste-disposal options.

Through a partnership with the Division of Solid Waste Management’s Materials Management Program, the Office of Policy and Sustainable Practices, and Tennessee State Parks, we cannot only divert waste from landfills but also increase awareness of the importance of recycling among state park visitors. The project completed upgrades in three separate phases. The first phase, as previously noted, implemented Bear Saver recycling receptacles at all exterior locations. The second phase is to implement Recycle Away interior recycling receptacles for all park buildings and venues. The third phase is currently underway and will add educational signage for guests about the Go Green with Us program, recycling, and ways they can reduce their footprint while visiting the park. These recycling upgrades will enable us to meet our visitors' needs and uphold our responsibility to protect Tennessee's public lands and natural resources.

2020-2025 Accomplishments

  • Developed a map that allows citizens to find the locations of all operating, permitted convenience centers, transfer stations, and solid waste processors in the state of Tennessee.
  • Resumed grant awards after a three-to four-year gap;
    • Twelve Recycling Equipment Grants
    • Ten Used Automotive Fluid Recycling Grants
    • Nine Recycling Rebates
    • Eight Convenience Center Grants
    • Two Household Hazardous Waste Collection Facility Grants
    • Special Project, Solid Waste Plans
    • Special Project, Waste Characterization Study
  • Active efforts through grant prioritization to replace and eliminate the reliance on unmanned county collection systems a.k.a. “Green Boxes”.
  • Partnered with the Recycle Partnership and SERDC to develop a website called Recycle Right TN, with statewide standards for a common suite of materials for recycling to create uniformity and simplify the process for residents.
  • Successful and viable integration of the Tennessee Materials Marketplace into the private sector for ongoing operation and management by Rheaply LLC.
  • Developed webpage resources to promote proper electronic recycling.
  • Compilation of an R2 Certified Recyclers list that includes facility name, location, materials accepted, services, and whether they offer drop off services.
  • Continued provision of HHW Mobile Collection events.

2020-2025 Review

The West Tennessee Recycling Hub, located outside the city of Henderson in Chester County, successfully managed ongoing partnerships with 25 colleges, 14 cities and counties, and over 250 businesses. The program processed 7,000 tons of material, most of which was cardboard and paper. This volume is significantly higher than the 300-ton yearly average at the outset of the initial partnership in 2012. There are 50 manufacturers in Tennessee that utilize post-consumer materials as their primary feedstock for their products. Notably, Domtar, a manufacturer of corrugated cardboard, has recently retooled its entire operation near Knoxville to process entirely recycled material.

The Tennessee Materials Marketplace (TMM), launched in 2017, has directly facilitated the recycling and repurposing of over 15 million pounds of material. The TMM was only part of a national system that included materials marketplaces in Austin, Texas; Detroit, Michigan; Ohio; Iowa; and Canada. The TMM, due to a handful of very large recurring transactions, accounted for over 75% of the total materials recycled from 2017 to 2022. Rheaply LLC, a private start-up in reverse logistics, purchased the entire national materials marketplace from the United States Business Council for Sustainable Development in mid-2021. This transition aligns with the initial vision of a private organization that manages and operates an efficient, effective materials exchange.

2020-2025 Accomplishments

  • Rheaply LLC has successfully assumed ownership and management of the Tennessee Materials Marketplace from the United States Business Council for Sustainable Development, ensuring long-term viability and improvement.
  • Actively facilitated Tennessee projects involving recycling or reusing materials from Tennessee’s Green Star Partnership industries.

2020-2025 Review

In late 2020, OSP (Office of Sustainable Practices) began discussions with representatives in Florida who later hosted their first Florida Food Waste Prevention Week in 2021. OSP began planning Tennessee’s first week-long event in June 2021.  That planning culminated in Tennessee’s first Food Waste Awareness Week hosted in conjunction with Florida, Oregon, and a few other states and large cities during the week of April 4 – April 9, 2022. OSP’s Sustainable Workplace program provides resources for employees and businesses, educating them on sustainable practices, whether in the workplace or while working from home. One resource the program provides is a guide to create your own organic collection program for your office.

2020-2025 Accomplishments

  • Continued to grow and expand Get Food Smart Tennessee.
  • Through Get Food Smart Tennessee, we developed many resources for individuals, businesses, and organizations, worked with organizations to host webinars, and launched Tennessee’s first Food Waste Awareness Week.
  • Hosted first Food Waste Awareness Week in April 2022 in conjunction with other states across the country.
  • Coordinated annual statewide food drive with 44 drop-off locations collecting over 17,700 pounds of donations each year.
  • Hosted Zero Waste Day on October 27, 2023, in partnership with the Tennessee Environmental Council and Metropolitan Nashville-Davidson County’s Zero Waste Program.
  • Added food scraps as a category to the Tennessee Materials Marketplace.
  • Published list of compost operations within Tennessee to expand resources for collection, processing, and end-use of organic material from residents.
  • Updated the Tennessee Liability of Free Food Distributors Law.
  • Created and published “Understanding Food Donor Liability Protections” infographic.

2020-2025 Review

The Objective 5 Team is currently working on developing resources to add to the Objective 5 webpage. The resources will provide information to businesses and local governments considering new technologies. The resources will include links to relevant policies that could affect the implementation of new technologies, contact information for technical assistance, and examples of new technologies that industries currently implement both statewide and nationwide.

2020-2025 Accomplishments

  • Initiated review of regulations, the Solid Waste Disposal Act, and other policies that contain language and references to the development and implementation of new technology.
  • Continued identifying developers of new technological approaches to recycling and contacting those operators.

2020-2025 Review

TDEC offered Campus Food Pantry grants in fiscal years 2020-2022 supporting Tennessee Higher Education Institutions' establishment of on-campus food pantries. One requirement for receiving grant funding was to ensure that a portion of the pantry's food came from a recaptured food source. Three schools took part in this initiative: Roan State Community College and the Tennessee Colleges of Applied Technology (TCAT) in Elizabethton and Jacksboro. Since the first year of this program, the Campus Food Pantry initiative has served 5,239 students and diverted 51,687 pounds of food from municipal solid waste landfills.

2020-2025 Accomplishments

  • The Tennessee School Laboratory Rehabilitation Program, or TSLRP, resumed after a hiatus caused by the COVID-19 pandemic.
  • Updated, revised, and published for distribution, the Role of the Regional Municipal Solid Waste Board in Tennessee: A Handbook for Members, 2nd Edition, is a document to aid regional board governance.
  • Developed a complementary MS PowerPoint presentation resource to augment the publication, “Role of the Regional Municipal Solid Waste Board in Tennessee, a Handbook for Members.”
  • “Mini” grants offered by the Office of Sustainable Practices;
  • Continued and expanded the Tennessee Green Star Partnership (TGSP).
  • Developed and promoted the Tennessee Sustainable Spirits (TNSS) voluntary recognition program that seeks to reduce operational impacts for wineries, breweries, and distilleries.
  • Continued with Get Food Smart Tennessee, an initiative to reduce food waste throughout the state.
  • Promoted a full week to engage the public with educational opportunities, statewide food drives, and regional events promoting food waste awareness.

2020-2025 Review

Several counties have permanent household hazardous waste (HHW) collection sites for their residents. Additionally, the Department, through grant offerings, has strategically placed six temporary HHW containers (HHWTFs) across the state to provide year-round HHW disposal opportunities for all Tennessee residents. TDEC has also established temporary collection sites following large-scale natural disasters in hard-hit areas of the state. After floodwater damaged 573 homes in Humphreys County in August of 2021 and a tornado damaged more than 700 structures in December of 2023, impacted residents at both locations could drop off their HHW materials for a two-week period without waiting for a mobile event as they rebuilt what nature had destroyed. Prescription drug takeback boxes provide a place where citizens can safely dispose of unused prescription drugs. These permanent boxes prevent prescription and over-the-counter medications from reaching children and entering waterways.

2020-2025 Accomplishments

  • Established a new e-scrap recycler requirement to submit a Recovered Materials Processing Facility Notification.
  • Approximately 54 mobile Household Hazardous Waste events are scheduled and serviced each year.
  • Continued to monitor and improve the Class I (MSW) landfill development, usage, and remaining permitted capacity in Tennessee.
  • The Department developed new rules and clarified definitions to promote the safe and environmentally sound disposal of solid waste in Tennessee.
  • Added ArcGIS maps to the state website, providing locations of solid waste infrastructure and facilities.

2020-2025 Review

Local governments fund municipal solid waste management primarily through local appropriations, with the majority coming from property taxes, local option sales taxes, and various tipping fees. Since the implementation of the 2025 Plan began, local funding sources have remained consistent, even though the allocation amounts have increased significantly.

The sustainability of funding for local governments is currently tied to their ability to allocate sufficient shares of property tax and local sales tax revenues. As costs for local solid waste management rise, the next decade may require alternative revenue sources to sustain program operations. At each budget cycle, officials must allocate funding for both required and discretionary projects and programs. Most counties account for solid waste revenues and expenditures in “Special Revenue Fund” accounts. These accounts restrict the use of solid waste management activities and provide some capacity for longer-range expenditure planning. While appropriations for solid waste operations appear to keep pace with rising expenditures, long-range infrastructure planning may need additional focus.

2020-2025 Accomplishments

  • No projects or accomplishments reported for this period.

Disaster Debris Management Plans

2020-2025 Review

TDEC collaborated with other state agencies to create a toolkit to guide county staff in developing debris management plans. The planning tool provides guidance and illustrates the steps the county must take to develop a debris management plan that satisfies the statutory requirements of T.C.A. § 68-211-815(b)(16) and FEMA program requirements. The toolkit seeks to create opportunities for engagement with local governments on disaster debris management planning. Also, it encourages counties to learn about the agency services provided by TDEC, TEMA, FEMA, and other stakeholders that play a vital role in debris management planning before an event. This understanding will help counties be better prepared when disasters do occur. Since the Department developed the Disaster Debris Management Toolkit in 2017, it has proved to be an important tool. However, the template needs updating to reflect policy changes, program changes (FEMA and TEMA), potential incorporation of environmental justice language, and any other appropriate changes. Creating tabletop exercise opportunities for key personnel within local governments, such as Mayors and County Executives, EMA personnel, public works and solid waste directors, and other responsible parties, allows them to actively practice implementing their plan before a critical event occurs. Exercises provide personnel with the opportunity to identify which parts of the plan work and to practice their roles. Practicing exercises provides everyone involved with the opportunity to make any necessary improvements and to increase preparedness for a disaster.

2020-2025 Accomplishments

  • Grand Division outreach efforts from TDEC, TEMA, and FEMA discussed current roles during a natural disaster and the importance of planning.
  • At statewide Air Pollution Control meetings, representatives from DSWM (DLP) from each field office and the central office discussed pre-approval staging and debris management plans.
  • Representatives from DSWM (DLP) and Metropolitan Nashville-Davidson County presented at TENSOS to educate attendees on DSWM (DLP) and TEMA roles, the DDM Planning, and how Metro Nashville-Davidson County prepared for disaster and their actions relating to the Christmas Day bombing.
  • The program was presented at an urban and community forest workshop on pre-approval requirements and debris management planning.
  • Incorporated a data field into the 2023 Annual Progress Report revision to better track material volumes managed due to a disaster event.

End Term Section Source: Department of Environment and Conservation, 2025 - 2035 Plan Transition Report, Breakdown by Objectives, February 2025.

Assessing Efforts

For successful improvement, it is necessary to objectively and honestly assess the actions and results of any plan. The “Check” step, to be effective, must assess actions and identify the root cause of both successes and underachievement. There are many activities that may fit within the 2025 Plan framework that initially appear to be sound, practical, and effective projects. However, when objectively measured against the standard for impact (“Did the project reduce or cause to reduce significant amounts of waste destined for landfills?”), the element may fall short.

Lower impacts do not mean the project had no merit. On the contrary, the project may be more foundational and preparatory, building awareness and laying the groundwork for a larger project that will significantly impact waste flow. Large numbers of less impactful projects, in the absence of strong projects, though, harm the overall mission by failing to effectively divert and reduce waste bound for landfills.

The next two considerations are more project-management-oriented. These considerations address the question, “Was the 2025 Plan element important?” regarding the Department’s prioritization of the element and its decision to initiate and implement it with Departmental resources. The follow-up question asks, “What level of completion did the 2025 Plan element achieve?” relating to how well the Department implemented the planning element.

Rubric

Rubrics are an objective method of scoring or assessing a qualitative system such as the 2025 Plan’s implementation. The evaluation used the following rubric to objectively assess implementation of the 2025 Plan on the attached assessment chart. The reader will find the evaluation findings in the attached document as an addendum.

Ranking NumberImportance: 1 (Low Priority) to 5 (High Priority)Implementation: 1 (Never Started) to 5 (Complete)Effectiveness: 1 (No Impact) to 5 (High Impact)
1The plan element has little or no intrinsic value. No resources or efforts dedicated to implementing the element during the 2025 Plan term.

The Department never started the plan element, addressed it, or considered it during the 2025 Plan term.

The plan element action had no impact or effect on the stated purpose during the 2025 Plan term.
2The agency assigned the plan element intrinsic value, with resources or time allocated to its implementation at some level during the 2025 Plan term.

The plan element's initial implementation phase included base planning, pulling together of stakeholders, and discussions, but no substantial action towards implementation occurred during the 2025 Plan
term.

Plan element action resulted in little or no impact on the element's stated purpose during the 2025 Plan term. May have only aspirational or promotional benefits.

3The agency dedicated time and resources to implementing the plan element using existing staffing levels and resources, along with periodic stakeholder engagement events during the 2025 Plan term.

The agency completed the plan element's planning phase and initiated the implementation phase with limited success during the 2025 Plan term.

Plan element action resulted in moderate, mixed, or briefly achieved purpose results during the 2025 Plan term.

4The agency dedicated resources and time at expanded levels, or initiated new resource and time allocations, to the successful implementation of the plan element during the 2025 Plan term. The agency consistently engaged external stakeholder groups in participation and joint implementation, resulting in the element's successful one-time implementation.The agency successfully completed the planning, implementation, and completion phases during the 2025 Plan term.Effective plan element actions resulted in the plan element's stated purpose achievement during the 2025 Plan term.
5The agency prioritized the plan element as a cornerstone activity, consistently expanding resources and engaging external stakeholder groups for participation and joint implementation during the 2025 Plan term. The agency engaged in multiple communication efforts, with effective dedication of resources to build sustained, ongoing implementation.The agency completed all planning phases with success. The agency revisited the plan element multiple times, achieving success during the 2025 Plan term.Extremely effective actions resulting in the plan element's purpose being achieved beyond expectations, creating sustained improvement of the stated purpose during the 2025 Plan term.

The five Mobius loops in the left graphic visually depict the average ratings for the rubric outcomes corresponding to the tactic, strategy, objective, and overall, 2025 Plan.

From top to bottom (1-5), as applied to the attached evaluation chart, they represent the “score” for that planning element. These scores are broad, relative, and based upon the averages of rubric assignments.

At the top, the three colorless arrows represent an average element rating indicating the plan element was not a priority, was not implemented, or was not impactful. One green arrow indicates that the plan element achieved some level of intended purpose with slight effort and little progress. Two arrows reflect a plan element considered successful but still falls short of expectations as a fully complete and impactful activity. Three arrows fully achieve expectations, representing a complete and impactful project. Similarly, the glowing three arrows represent not only a completed plan element but also one that had a significant impact and was completed or revisited multiple times. Using the above rubric to generate a visual representation of the plan evaluation’s “report card”, the findings indicate and fall into each arrow level as follows:

ArrowTacticsStrategiesObjectivesPlan
31%24%25%0%

 

 

29%21%63%100%
 31%36%13%0%
7%3%0%0%
 1%3%0%0%

Learning From Our Efforts

As the Department moves towards the “Act” step of the PDCA cycle, we must apply lessons learned to the areas needing improvement. The objective assessment identifies where the Department needs improvement, but there is still a need to prioritize these improvements and embed them in the systems that will implement future planning efforts. The Act step would normally include recording, standardizing, and memorializing the improved approaches, then saving and distributing them to those working on future projects.

The Department must apply lessons learned to help prevent the recurrence of ineffective measures and approaches. Unfortunately, and all too often, organizations repeat failed approaches from the past for many reasons – staff turnover, lack of knowledge, and disregard for lessons learned. Establishing sound principles of plan governance will improve future successes.

Another concept for understanding why projects fail or are ineffective is the “3-Rs of Success” that an organization needs to implement to complete projects successfully. The 3-R’s, or to put it in a better frame, the Resources, Resolve, and Real Estate, all play into any successful project. Without adequate financial, material, or technical resources; management and the people’s resolve to make a project happen; and the real estate to house, store, or hold infrastructure and events, that project will fail. Addressing the 3 Rs across all future projects will increase the likelihood of success and improve the system. The impact of the 3-R’s theme runs through the next section, What Worked, What Did Not Work, or What Needs Improvement and Why.

What Worked, Did Not Work, or Needs Improvement and Why

When evaluating whether actions achieved their stated goals, the purpose is not to assign blame or commend specific organizational units or project leaders, but to honestly assess how the Department can improve to achieve success in future planning. Some successes may have been short-lived, while other projects that did not initially work became successful with changes. This section seeks only to identify the root causes of success or failure and how the Department can address them to optimize improvement efforts.

What Worked?

Success looks different depending on what the reviewer considers accomplished, the review's assessment of its merit, and how the review assesses success. The following actions enumerate approaches, projects, or attitudes that worked and were deemed successful in implementing the plan.

  1. At the highest level, and from the outset, the construction of a well-designed, actionable plan with its time-proven, comprehensive strategies and supportive tactics was foundational to all success.
  2. From the development stages, frequent and sustained stakeholder engagement across all interests initiated new and impactful conversations about the management of solid waste in Tennessee.
  3. Mid-term: implementation had a clear, united vision and end goal.
  4. Mid-term plan implementation benefited from the recruitment of strong, knowledgeable institutional and subject matter experts who translated plan concepts into effective, well-defined projects.
  5. Mid-term plan implementation actively mobilized and consistently engaged stakeholders across all objectives to achieve effective project outcomes.
  6. Mid-term: the institution’s plan, understanding of critical concepts and broad support were strong.
  7. Mid-term: the complete and recurring implementation of Objective 4: Increase Diversion of Organics. The objective’s crowning success was improving public policy, e.g., adopting the U.S. Compost Council’s model rule for composting facilities.
  8. Mid-term: creating and building successful external partnerships that lead to sustainable diversion activities, e.g., the transition and establishment of a self-sustaining private materials marketplace, sustainable classroom teacher training, Tennessee Training Academy, and the establishment of a state-based composting council.
  9. Mid-term: grant programs with operational improvements that targeted specific plan objectives and standardized grant project management, e.g., Grant Management Systems (GMS), standardizing contract project language (e.g., scopes of services, awarded fund matching, Title VI tracking, and other supporting documentation), and broader grant program classifications (e.g., Subsidy, Technical Assistance, and Contract for Service) that allowed for greater consistency between grant programs of the same type.
  10. Mid-term: High-quality and effective grant programs, e.g., Hub and Spoke, Organics

Management and Material Marketplace Development.

  1. Mid-term: Technical assistance professional development programs that increased the knowledge of contractors (e.g., annual development district planners’ meetings) and solid waste professionals (e.g., Top 5 Rebate County quarterly roundtables, Hub and Spoke Operators training, and the Tennessee Training Academy).
  2. Mid-term: The use of standardized messaging and infrastructure (e.g., Hub and Spoke material signage, TSP Bear Saver container roll-out, development of common suites of materials, and technical guides).
  3. End-term: Significant decrease in the number of unmanned county collection system containers across the state.
  4. Improved coordination between regulatory and technical assistance programs.

What Did Not Work?

The following provides broad themes based on reported actions that the Department could improve moving forward and apply to future plan implementation. Learning from these and applying needed or identified changes will increase the likelihood of successful projects. Unfortunately, COVID-19 impacted many end-term projects and disrupted the continuity of plans. However, despite the disruption, the end-term period still appears, on the surface, less impactful, less focused, less connected to the Plan, with more focus on applying existing siloed efforts to the 2025 Plan schema rather than on the coalescence of partnerships brought together to achieve a specific tactic or strategy.

  1. Though the Department made efforts, it failed to adopt and update a reasonable waste reduction and diversion goal for the state or the municipal solid waste planning regions to reduce waste going to landfills.
  2. Improving data quality, security, and integrity in a timely manner to support sound policy decisions, such as adopting a needed new goal, remains a challenge.
  3. End term: moved from useful and effective outreach materials (e.g., guidance, useful informational brochures, and mission-supportive tools such as used oil funnels and catch containers) to outreach collateral that goes directly to the landfill after initial interest dies off.
  4. Late mid-term to end term: Loss of 2025 Plan vision, usage, and understanding.
  5. End term: Less effective, impactful, and unaligned projects that are more random without fitting into the Plan objective or strategy structure assignment, but project leaders place them into a “best fit” planning element to gain plan support legitimacy.
  6. Late mid-term to end term: The significant reallocation of funding resources from plan-directed projects that improve local government infrastructure to one-off or siloed projects.
  7. Failing to align or harmonize competing interests with plan priorities.
  8. Failing to recognize key cornerstone projects that achieve targeted objectives and preserve these projects for renewal and long-term survivability, such as #RecycleRight, Recycling Hub and Spoke systems, establishment of a common suite of materials, increased access to best management practices, data management, and setting strong material recovery or diversion goals.

How Can We Address Improvement?

Applying lessons learned is important for implementing future plans. The following points outline recommended approaches to successfully implementing an actionable plan. The elements are strategic and do not address project-level implementation. The improvements expect the completion of projects using at least basic project management approaches: planning, resourcing, mobilization, execution, and assessment.

  1. Adopt new statewide solid waste plans at the highest level, preferably the Governor's, but at least the Department head level, to enhance and support the 3-R’s resolve element and improve action prioritization.
  2. Create, implement, and manage all solid waste planning activities from an actionable project perspective. Request, in advance, that suitable project charters and project planning be in place for the proposed project initiation to avoid poorly thought-out, unsupported, and less impactful projects.

Avoid non-plan-supported activities.

  1. Continuously improve staff training to provide a foundational understanding of sound solid waste management and materials management principles.

a) effectively manage, report, and track projects;

b) build coalitions that identify broad interests and find areas of agreement;

c) discern and identify effective projects; and

d) successfully plan and implement those projects.

  1. Engage the public and private sector partners beyond awareness to active participation.
  2. Initiate and direct solid waste programs toward Part-9 Authority implementation to treat solid waste more like a utility than a service, as water was in the 1990s to early 2000s. This will improve financial sustainability and the ability to act more effectively toward plan goals at the local level. Provide financial and technical assistance to encourage adoption.
  3. Standardize and implement core functions and definitions.

a. The Commissioner establishes, in accordance with the SWMA of 1991, financial supplemental reporting that breaks down the true costs, revenues, and returns for each solid waste management element (collection, disposal, and recycling) to provide a true apples-to-apples accounting comparison.

Improve data management collection, storage, and retrieval processes through the use of a promulgated data management plan to drive fact-based decision-making. Governance of a material dictionary and defining the processes to amend and expand that dictionary.

b. Promulgate and adopt a waste characterization standard based on ASTM D5231-92(2016), Standard Test Method for Determination of the Composition of Unprocessed Municipal Solid Waste, that will dictate future waste characterization study parameters to ensure consistent study-to-study continuity. If not directly specified in an ASTM standard, adopt a standard material classification taxonomy for all future characterizations.

  1. Adopt a policy that returns to the grant program solicitation and subsequent offerings that meets a specific planning objective element, in accordance with a promulgated grant management plan. Stay within the grant management plan without deviation. Plan to handle non-plan needs, setting criteria, limits, and breaks to protect funding and identify quality projects of opportunity.
  2. Carefully discern projects, selecting only projects that meet established plan criteria, are based on clear measurable targets, and will be impactful. Avoid projects that only have awareness value or make good press. Define expectations and drive to completion.
  3. Avoid the temptation to treat local program efforts as progress toward the goal that the Department did not conceive, initiate, or coordinate locally as part of the Plan’s objective outcomes. Be deliberate in actions.
  4. Lastly, the Department must focus its efforts on high-quality, impactful projects that drive change through modernization, expansion, and policy development, culminating in reducing and diverting significant amounts of waste from landfills.

Process

The objective review and accomplishments for the mid- and end-term periods of the 2025 Plan implementation are derived from the mid-term progress report represented in the FY 2020-2021 Annual Report to the Governor and General Assembly on the SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT ACT OF 1991, Release Date April 6, 2022, and a transition document prepared for internal use in formulating the initiation of the 2025-2035 Statewide Solid Waste Planning period. Minor edits to improve readability or applicability were made in adapting elements from these documents. Dashboard and rubric value assignments were based on the full 10-year Plan implementation period. Senior program staff present during both phases (mid- and end-term) complete the analysis based on the 10-year period unless otherwise noted.

For questions concerning this document and its methodology, please contact the Division of Solid Waste Management at Solid.Waste@tn.gov and reference the 2025 Plan Implementation Dashboard.

Contact
William "Bill" Anderson
615-946-1172
William.Anderson.jr@tn.gov
Amber Greene
615-651-9540
Amber.Greene@tn.gov

This Page Last Updated: November 2, 2026 at 8:58 PM